The ruling was ultimately a victory for the Fourteenth Amendment and a loss for the conservative legal movement that’s been trying to erase it.

Barrett voted with the Supreme Court majority on upholding the Fourteenth Amendment.

Amy Coney Barrett joined the Supreme Court’s liberal justices in one very big decision on voting rights.

The conservative bloc’s only consistent practice is its inconsistent application of its own “history-and-tradition” test.

A pair of less heralded decisions shine a bright light on the Roberts court’s appetite for constitutional destruction.

Time was that David Souter was the bête noire of the right wing. But now judges like Amy Coney Barrett aren’t passing muster.

Despite their handing him an endless array of political wins over the past few years, the president still believes his nominees haven’t shown sufficient loyalty.

The unconstitutional demand came in the midst of an unhinged rant over the potential birthright citizenship ruling.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett blew a hole in Donald Trump’s case.

The Supreme Court doesn’t seem to be buying the Trump administration’s argument for overturning birthright citizenship.

The recent oral arguments in an important voting rights case suggest that the right wing of the high court has a suspect media diet.

For the court’s conservatives, the only consistency is their inconsistency. Still, things rather conspicuously keep going the GOP’s way.

It may look like the justices made a clean break with the president, but the mess the conservative bloc made for itself raises some major questions.

President Trump is pissed at the conservative justices who voted to strike down his tariffs.

If the Supreme Court takes up Taylor v. Singleton, it could be the sum of all fears for the most vulnerable Americans.

Now that the Supreme Court’s conservative bloc is putting the unitary executive theory to the test, its cracks are beginning to show—and its proponents are flailing.

At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale they used to bedevil Joe Biden.

Or, as Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani would say: Tax the rich.

At oral arguments, the high court’s conservatives seemed inclined to back gay conversion therapy. But they ultimately may not stop there.

If things stay true to form, President Trump will benefit from the Roberts court’s generous takes on executive power. The rest of us may not be so lucky.