With the Supreme Court allowing the end of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians, national and local economies could feel the sting.

In Trump v. Slaughter, the Progressive era takes it on the chin.

The ruling was ultimately a victory for the Fourteenth Amendment and a loss for the conservative legal movement that’s been trying to erase it.

Kavanaugh does not consider birthright citizenship to be a done deal.

The police department already consumes the lion’s share of the city budget—and its own liabilities are burdening taxpayers with staggering costs.

The conservative bloc’s only consistent practice is its inconsistent application of its own “history-and-tradition” test.

The smart and totally justified way to do it: Increase the number of judicial circuits.

The president’s voter suppression crusade just hit a huge snag.

The conservative justices apparently will let Trump do whatever he wants to immigrants.

A federal judge in Virginia tried to offer the Justice Department an off-ramp in the slush fund matter. Naturally, Blanche & Co. refused to take it.

The highs and lows of the American experiment

These landmark decisions left an indelible mark on our society—some for the better, some for the worse.

Florida’s use of six-person juries is heavily at odds with our legal traditions—and on a collision course with a hostile high court.

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder is being weaponized by the right in the reproductive rights wars—and putting fetuses at greater risk.

A shadow docket reveals that for some justices, there are limits to how cruel an execution can be. And for others, there are none.

Brendan Sorsby may have violated the league’s rules, but college football’s governing body is discovering just how unsustainable the organization’s legal status really is.

The high court’s Callais ruling is already being used to delete majority-minority federal districts. But its most catastrophic impact may be felt closer to home.

An administration lawyer made this shocking and cynical argument in court last week. That’s the position of an emperor, not a president.

The high court will once again wade into a collision between church and state—and choose between two wildly different ideas of religious pluralism.

The ride-hailing giant is accusing personal injury lawyers and doctors of a fraudulent racketeering scheme involving injured passengers. It’s an obvious intimidation tactic.