Donald Trump is trying to claim he achieved a major victory with his threats to impose tariffs on Mexico. There’s just one glaring problem.

In Black Southern life, guns have been a sign of readiness against constant threats.

When schoolchildren get shot, Republicans say it’s just one of those things. Funny, then, that when Donald Trump got shot, they pounced into action.

Can the Aloha State defy the Roberts court on a controversial Second Amendment decision? They may soon find out.

A gun case and a death penalty case are among those on the docket—with zero sign that the conservative majority cares about the court’s falling reputation.

If the vice president really thinks that keeping a gun in her home makes her safer, then she’s much less informed about the issue than she pretends to be.

A recent lower court ruling asserting a constitutional right to own military hardware suggests that the conservative legal movement has the country on a grim path.

She can show how U.S. weapons are driving immigrants.

Trump thought about it. Biden should do it.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

The court’s bump-stock ruling is a shell game.

It’s fairer to say that the president took steps to shrink it, rather than abolish it entirely. But even that put John Cornyn’s knickers in a twist.

At oral arguments on Monday, the court took a dim view of the heavy-handed way that Andrew Cuomo and the State of New York attempted to crack down on the gun rights group.

Two years after the high court’s ruling in Bruen, we now live in a world with a constitutional expectation that any firearm is a legal firearm.

October’s mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, was one of more than a dozen high-profile attacks carried out by people who retained their gun rights after hospitalization during a mental health crisis.

Originalism is all the rage on the right, but a gun case at the Supreme Court is exposing its absurdity—even to the conservative justices.

The justices heard a case challenging a federal law restricting guns for domestic abusers—and saw an opportunity to clean up the mess their previous gun ruling has caused.

A lower court split over bump stocks—a device that enabled the deadliest mass shooting in American history—is sending fresh cases steaming toward the high court.

Justices Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals to uphold federal regulations on so-called “ghost guns.”

The court could issue a ruling on gun ownership that would have a catastrophic impact on victims of domestic violence.